Positives of distance learning
Initially, the opportunity to study in correspondence was created for working people who do not have the opportunity to attend lectures. The second way can be evening training, however even it is not available if the person lives and works very far from the university.
Thus, the correspondence department is convenient to those who are far from the educational institution. It is also easier to combine it with work – can be engaged independently, and during the session under Russian legislation the employer is obliged to provide leave.
Another plus distance learning is self-planning of teaching time. You will not need to attend lectures of a subject in which you are so versed and ready to pass on a positive assessment. At the same time, you will have more time for library classes in the most difficult disciplines for you.
In a number of cases, a part-time student may attend separate lectures with the bulk of students, but the rules depend on the particular university.
The pros of full-time education
Most students, however, continue to study in full-time departments of universities. This can be explained by the many benefits of traditional learning.
Men of military age should be mindful that distance learning does not entitle them to deferment from military service.
Firstly, the student has the opportunity to attend many more lectures and practical classes than in correspondence, where they are often limited to 1-2 weeks per semester. During these classes, the student is more likely to understand the topic well than when self-examining the question.
Second, full-time learning allows you to better control your time. In many subjects there is not only final, but also intermediate control, which allows the student long before the session to understand complex and unclear issues, as well as to practice in solving typical jobs. Full-time learning best suits those who find it difficult to plan their time on their own.
Third plus full-time education is its in most cases higher quality. It is difficult to bring all universities and faculties to the common denominator, but in most cases the demand from students is stricter than those who complete correspondence studies. This may be a disadvantage for those who expect only a diploma from learning, but will please those glasses who have chosen this form of training to obtain quality knowledge.
Thus, it is possible to conclude that both full-time and part-time studies have their advantages, and to choose the form of education should be based on the personal circumstances of the applicant.